Revision as of 20:27, 21 February 2017 (view source) Simon Poole (talk \| contribs) (→‎History) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:36, 18 April 2017 (view source) Simon Poole (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Moving forward from the licence change in 2012, we expect to play a license maintenance role and to be “educational” in helping people in and outside the OSM community to understand our license and working to clarify issues raised. In addition, we want to explore taking OSMF to be a more outward-looking organisation within the arena of promoting free and open geospatial data licensing. ~~More~~Our ~~information~~formal ~~about~~[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gZa8mlB7vdOeB_BhlC4mB58ZWo0MaotAUhn29h0658U/edit?usp=sharing ~~what~~remit] weframes ~~would~~our ~~like to do~~responsibilities and ~~what~~the weareas ~~must~~we ~~focus~~concentrate on, ~~can~~our beplans ~~found~~for inthis ayear can found here: [https://docs.google.com/document/d/~~1D3KwSM_BO7KkcbVADQVVn7eFwkD~~1FW1QGY-~~RNauMwidhhlVPsI~~A02Ny5n1s2sRO0wIOTkoX_zoc3c0qZ3YE84o/~~pub our~~edit?usp=sharing ~~2013~~2017 action plan]. If you have noticed a potential licence violation by a consumer of OpenStreetMap data and have been unable to resolve the matter bilaterally, please feel free to contact the LWG via e-mail.

Licensing Working Group: Difference between revisions

Licensing Working Group (view source)