Board/Minutes/2020-10-S2S/Creating software dispute resolution panel

From OpenStreetMap Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notes by participants. Might be enriched.

This session took place in parallel with "Legal team and Brexit implications - resolve how to respond". A summary was provided to the other group.


Board members

  • Mikel Maron
  • Tobias Knerr
  • Rory McCann
  • Paul Norman
  • Allan Mustard

The rest of the board members participated in the parallel session "Legal team and Brexit implications - resolve how to respond".




  • Steps to selecting composition of this group
  • Choose something people will trust can come to resolution ([name=Rory])

Data Working Group (DWG) offer

  • Allan: DWG say they are overloaded already. Software different from data integrity. Lack of geographic diversity in the group.
  • Mikel: the DWG works on a task assignment basis, rather than deliberative body
  • Paul: why did we ask the WGs? most tagging issues shouldn't be raised to a dispute
    • Mikel > community asked. intention was to receive interest and then assess.
  • Rory: DWG has relevant experience, but we'd need to see a concrete proposal. Is geodiversity that much of an issue for resolving these disputes?
  • Tobias: skepticism of appointment vs some way of earning responsibility. so lean towards known group. geodiversity historically not main cause of disputes (producer v consumer, different use cases)


  • Give to DWG.
    • Rory: could help increase DWG membership.
    • Mikel: unsure about how membership selection works in DWG.
    • Tobias: could give it to DWG with charge to make a subgroup.
  • Have DWG make nominations.
  • Invite nominations from DWG and from wider community.

How to select

  • Rory: Board would need to vote on the composition. With five people selected, then we can practically determine its make up.
  • Allan: We need to assess past work and reputation of these folks to see that they will do well. Look at their application.


  • Allan will start drafting a document with questions to the Data Working Group (DWG) about what their implementation could look like. We're still seeking a proposal, and still holding the decision

Action items

  • Allan to start online document with intention to send in 1 week.

Pending issues, not addressed

  • how will the panel ultimately be composed?
  • who else will be interested to join?