Board/Minutes/2020-10-S2S/Regulating corporate participation in foundation bodies

From OpenStreetMap Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notes by participants. Might be enriched.

This session took place in parallel with the session "Supporting API". A summary of this session was provided to the other group.

Participants

Board members

  • Tobias Knerr
  • Allan Mustard
  • Mikel Maron
  • Rory McCann

The rest of the board members participated in the parallel session "Supporting API".

Biographies.

Notes

  • Recent Examples: Licensing Working Group (LWG) membership, discussion in Communication Working Group (CWG) about balance of topics.
  • Concern about corporate influence was one of the issues that came up during community consultation.
  • We do have a perception issue, there may be some perception that corporations have more influence than they actually do.
    • might be corrected somewhat by highlighting our decisions that are demonstrably not overly corporate-friendly (attribution, conflict of interest rules).
  • There's a risk of discouraging people from contributing; we could offer clearer structures for where someone could help.
  • (Some) corporations are not clear what the rules of the game are; one avenue for dialog are the Advisory Board (AB) corporate meetings.
  • Corporations are reaching out to Local Chapters (LC) as part of organized mapping efforts.
  • LCs might be our allies in this effort.
  • Make members realize their power to make resolutions.
  • Communicate...
    • ... on what we're doing to strengthen volunteers.
    • ... positive examples of corporations doing it right.

Decisions

  • Raise topic during the Local Chapter advisory board meeting next week.
  • Continue to keep an eye on the situation and respond appropriately if needed.